Upcoming Speaking: SXSW Interactive and Microsoft MIX10

March 9, 2010 — Tiffani — leave a comment?

SXSW and MIX are quickly approaching, and Matt and I are getting excited for the round three of meeting, thinking and drinking. If you’ll be at either conference this year, come say hey. We’re the newlyweds who dress the same.

If you’re there for the education, you can also come here us speak…

SXSW Interactive

I’m moderating a panel, Writing Web Content for a Living, with three smartypants content strategy experts: Ian Alexander of Eat Media, Erin Anderson of Brain Traffic, and Dan Maccarone of Hard Candy Shell. We’ll be talking about the mechanics of writing web content: what’s involved, how content strategy fits in, and how to start doing it.

The panel is on Sunday, March 14th, at 12:30 PM in Ballroom C.

The rest of the time, Matt and I will be attending other peoples’ presentations and going out and about at night—at the Twitter Happy Hour on Thursday, Happy Cogaoke on Saturday, and Mashable’s MashBash on Sunday, at least.

Also, if you’re into content strategy and web writing, here’s a list of must-see panels.

MIX10

My talk, Treat Your Content Right, is scheduled for Wednesday, March 17th, at 12:00pm in Breakers J. I’ll be giving a high-level overview of principles that can help your team improve your content and incorporate basic content strategy practices into your process.

Matt’s talk, Running With Wireframes: Taking Information Architecture Into Design, is scheduled for Wednesday, March 17th, at 1:30pm in Breakers D. He’ll be talking about ways to better integrate UX and IA into design through a flexible process and open collaboration between content folks, information architects, and designers.

We’ll be at the MIX on Tuesday and Wednesday, and will be attending presentations all day. Hope we see you in the hallway!

Before You Hire a Writer

February 19, 2010 — Tiffani — 7 comments

Matt and I are lucky, because every time one of us runs into an obstacle with our business, the other gets to learn about it. One obstacle we’ve come across lately is people who come to me for web writing or copywriting, but who really need strategy, IA, and design help.

Strange gripe, considering that most the time we run into the opposite problem—people who think a good design can solve all their business problems, even though there’s no content (or content strategy) to support it.

Fortunately, investing in solid, web-optimized writing can do a lot for your website: it can make it easier to navigate, more appealing, increase your readership, and help your audience connect with your message. But just like design, IA, or content strategy in isolation, good writing is not a magic tool for generating sales or refining your brand.

When it comes to the web, cohesion between your business strategy, writing, IA, design, and functionality are required to tell the perfect story. That said, it’s still very important that your site be professionally written. If you’re in the market for a writer, here are a few things to think about:

Before You Hire a Writer.

Editors, Writers, and Content Strategists do different things (even though some people do all three). If you’re pretty confident with the writing you have and just need someone to nip/tuck or make it a little more web friendly, an editor who knows the web should be fine. If you need someone to define high-level messages that will drive the content on your site or write content from scratch, start with a web writer. If you need someone to create a long-term plan not just for the static content on your site, but also for the content you plan to publish in the future (blog posts, articles, etc.) then a content strategist would be helpful.

However, if you need someone to help you figure out what your business model is (aka, what kinds of things you offer or what your brand attributes are), it’s not time to hire a writer yet.

There are many kinds of Content Strategists. Some Content Strategists focus on keywords and metadata. Some focus on SEO. Some focus on optimizing the back-end technologies you need to publish your content. Some focus on defining what channels your content will be distributed across. Some focus on defining what messages you’re trying to communicate on your website, and how.

Don’t expect that any one Content Strategist will be able to address all these issues. And if you need someone to address all these issues, hire a multi-person firm that specializes in Content Strategy, like Brain Traffic or Eat Media. See Kristina Halvorson’s article in A List Apart for more.

Copywriter doesn’t always mean Web Writer. In theory, web writers should understand how to create marketing copy, and copywriters should understand how to write for the web. In practice, this is not the case. If you need content written for your website, don’t assume you’ll get good results by hiring a seasoned copywriter—only a good web writer who’s familiar with UX, IA, and how people read on the web will do the job right. If you don’t know whether your copywriter understands the web, take a look at the design and writing on his or her website. This should give you a good indication.

A linear processes is not always best. Usually, a redesign process goes something like this: content strategy, copy and web writing, information architecture, design, templates, programming. You might find, however, that you don’t need a complete content strategy, that you need to generate more copy after you’ve finished IA, or that you have to rewrite a lot of your copy so it harmonizes with the visual design. No matter how good a planner you are, a linear process in which each phase is rigidly locked after it’s finished does not necessarily produce a great product or project experience. Plan for an organic process, and expect that all your web specialists will need to talk to one another.

To see just how “organic” things can be, check out Nishant Kothary’s visualization of the process we followed during the MIX Online Redesign. (Read his wonderful article, The Anatomy of a Web Design, too).

A website is like a book in at least one way. If you remove an entire chapter from a book or rearrange its chapters, you’ll have to spend time rewriting it in order for it to make sense. If you change the thesis statement that the book is based on, the writing will have to be adjusted accordingly. Likewise, if you completely rethink a site’s information architecture or remove or condense pages, the messages and writing will have to be reworked accordingly. And if you change your web strategy (from “this site is oriented around my public speaking” to “this site is oriented toward my company’s portfolio,” for example) mid-stream, you will have to go back to the drawing board with copy.

Like a book, most marketing websites have a certain narrative quality—one page/thought should lead naturally to another, and the whole thing should work together to tell a great story. If you rethink one part of your story, it’s likely that another will be affected.

Writing and pictures are in love. You should not think of copy and design as mutually exclusive. Much of what makes the copy on your website on-tone, on-brand, and on-message depends on how well it harmonizes with your visuals, and vice versa. A great design/copy combination is the best way to tell a great story—and the best way to tell if your strategy and messages are working.

I’ve written about this before.

A well-written site is not cheap. Prices for good web writing span a wide range, but don’t expect it to be cheap. $25.00/hr is not enough, unless you’re hiring someone to edit your footer. Content Strategy will be even more expensive than web writing. Like good design, great writing is an investment that takes lots of research and revisions to get right.

Common sense is gold. Do not go rushing out to hire a content strategist just because everyone on the web is talking about content strategy. Do not spend 60k rewriting and designing your site until you have a good idea of why you’re doing it, with a rationally prioritized list of goals you’d like to accomplish. Before you hire someone to tell you what your goals are, sit down with a piece of paper and work them out yourself. Don’t hire anyone whose services you do not have a basic grasp of. Et cetera.

Don’t hire a writer if you don’t understand the value of good writing. No writer wants to work with a grumbly client who doesn’t see the value of her work. No client wants to work with someone he didn’t want to hire in the first place. To understand the value of good writing, start by doing some research.

Know your goals and business, first. I’ll say it again: no amount of copy, design, or organization will save you from a bad business model, a poor understanding of your business and audience or lack of a web strategy. If you don’t know these things, it’s probably smart to hold off on hiring copywriters, content strategists, or web designers until you’ve worked out your business plan. Because the most beautifully designed and written website in the world will fail if there’s not a solid purpose behind it.

The Case for Cohesion.

Everyone’s hot and bothered about content strategy and web writing right now, but that doesn’t mean that a good content plan or writing alone can solve all your problems. In fact, no one service can make your website successful. It takes a cohesive, thorough, and artistic combination of all these things, plus a deep understand of your own business model, to do that.

My suggestion is to take a practical, thoughtful approach and hire web specialists who work well together and understand one other’s disciplines.

Are You a Partner or a Vendor?

January 20, 2010 — Tiffani — 5 comments

Responding well to difficult client feedback is an epic challenge for design agencies. The situation is usually characterized as a side effect of “problem clients,” whose whims and idiosyncracies we must learn to delicately navigate. Unfortunately, this way of framing the issue masks a deeper, and more important problem: the fact that many clients aren’t sure whether the agency they’ve hired is a “vendor” or a “partner.”

Here, I’ll talk about the differences between the partners and vendors, and offer a few solutions to figuring out which category best describes your business.

The Difference Between Partner and Vendor

The difference between partners and vendors revolves around one central question: Does your agency simply fulfill job order specs handed to it via an RFP or per the client’s request, or does it actually help craft the strategy that drives the RFP or client’s requests? In other words, is your agency involved in critically thinking through the marketing and business objectives that determine what work should be done, or not?

If clients come to you for advice and look to you to help them work through strategy-related questions, you’re probably in the partner category. If clients come to you primarily for your technical expertise—your excellent command of photoshop, ability to pump out pixel-perfect XHTML, or unbelievable turnaround times—you might be in the vendor category.

Another way of putting it: Vendors carry out tasks (often beautifully, I should add). Partners help create the tasks, and then carry them out.

When Vendor Is Right

Although the way I’ve framed this conversation makes it seem like being in the vendor category might be bad, this is not necessarily true. Some businesses are built on a vendor framework: they usually know the scope of their projects, have a very crisp, predictable biz dev process, and pump out consistent work. Because their services are roughly the same from project to project, vendors are often nimble, expert craftsmen who are able to turn on a dime and accommodate last-minute changes and feature requests with ease. The same is not always true of partners.

When Vendor Is Wrong

Problems arise when agencies who’ve been hired for their web or communications strategy skills are treated like vendors. A common scenario for those in the partner category goes like this:

You’ve gone through a thorough strategy phase and helped your client discover the main problems with his website—the tone is off, the design doesn’t fit the branding strategy, and the user experience is poor. You’ve helped him create a strategy for his content, worked with him to generate high-level messages, made wireframes that display page-level requirements, and agreed on a look and feel for the design after submitting a round of moodboards. You’ve long-since signed the creative brief.

You’re halfway through template development, when suddenly your client (after talking with his boss or wife, let’s say) decides he wants to move everything on the home page around, change his concept for the blog, re-write the about page, and switch the colors on the whole site from orange to green. What happens next?

The difference between a vendor and a partner is, in some respects, the difference in how each gets treated in this situation. If you are treated as a vendor, your client will usually expect that you simply make the changes he requests—you can often (but not always) ask for a change order and add more to the budget if the changes are out of scope, but you probably won’t be invited to submit your opinion about the logic behind his decisions.

If you’re treated as a partner, it’s feasible that you can raise issues (beyond just budget and scope) with the changes. Do they make sense? Do they fit with your strategy? What business conditions caused your client’s boss/wife to suggest them? Are they really a good idea?

When Partner Is Right

Where you fit along the partner-vendor spectrum depends on what kind of ship you’re running, where your talents lie, and how well you tolerate and resolve uncertainty; when you start a strategy project or partner with a client, it’s not always clear where you’ll end up.

For our agency, partnering with clients is the definitive answer. We like high-level problem-solving about business goals and marketing strategy. We like the difficult conversations and back and forth it takes to come up with the right solution. We like helping our clients find new ways of communicating with their audience. Most of all, we like the long-term relationships that come from a partnering situation: clients come back to us for our opinions and advice, or to just think through a rough idea.

The same is not true for every agency. You may be more comfortable with a more clear cut, product-like rendering of your services, for example: you deliver the same wonderful thing every time, like a hot cup of coffee.

These days, it seems like every agency wants to be known as a strategy-oriented, problem-solving, critical thinking group of creatives. But I’m not sure this is actually true—there are just as many great reasons for being a “vendor” (as I’ve defined it here) as there are for being a “partner.” It all depends on your business model.

In my opinion, the trick is to spend a good deal of time discovering out where you fit along this spectrum. Then, you must communicate your decision clearly to clients, so they hire you for services you actually offer, have reasonable expectations about what you will and will not do, and respect your way of working.


Best of Brown


Introducing WhichDigi.com

Just a formal note about a site I launched a bit ago: WhichDigi? — http://whichdigi.com. It’s just a simple microsite to help people decide which type of entry-level camera to purchase.
The concept was to cut through the overloading of technical information surrounding digital cameras, with some simple and direct advice. Just spend a few […]

Been Busy

When it rains it pours right? I’ve been pretty busy this year. More than just busy though, I’ve been extremely lucky to work on some amazing projects with some wonderful teams and smart people.
This is what working as an independent, design agency is all about: good work, good people.

This week, three projects that I lead […]

Growing Pains: From Freelance to Agency

Refreshed
This is embarrassingly tardy, but I wanted to say thanks to all those attended my Seattle Refresh presentation a few weeks ago. My presentation was largely a follow up to a previous Refresh talk I gave, about my first few months of freelancing.
This time, I talked about my recent switch from strictly freelancing to a more […]

Work with me!

I run thingsthatarebrown — a smart, nimble web design studio. We make websites that help your business grow.
Let's talk.